Donate!

Showing posts with label global. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Global Warming VS. the Greenhouse Effect

Global warming posits the questions “will an increase in concentration of greenhouse gases lead to an increased global average temperature?” Whereas, the greenhouse effect is a fact that states that the average global temperature is warmer than it would be in the absence of an atmosphere due to greenhouse gases that are being absorbed and re-radiated.

Incoming shortwave (visible light and infrared) radiation gets absorbed by the Earth thus causing the ground to heat and emit longwave (infrared) radiation. The longwave radiation, then, gets absorbed by greenhouse gases (CO2, H2O, CH4) which, in turn, heats up and re-emits radiation out in every direction (some towards the Earth). Notably the cycle continues when some of that radiation, again, gets absorbed by the ground, heats the ground even more, emits even more radiation, and so on.

Friday, May 8, 2015

Global Challenge and the Role of Applied Anthropology

Encouraging immigrants to learn the national language and take on the social and cultural practices of their community is assimilation. It is largely being understood to have a utopian end result, or in other words, it’s a desired society where members would be culturally indistinguishable. To an individual it is the process of becoming completely adopted to another country, or becoming the ‘same,’ after coming from a, typically minority, immigrant group. Happening spontaneously, sometimes even unintentionally, those individuals tend to , inevitably, no longer want to relate to their country of origin, except for family history.
Whereas multiculturalism is a widely used term with many different meanings. Our understanding of multiculturalism tends to point to imbalances, discriminations or communities underlying the connection between individual freedom and cultural membership that come from diverse ethnic, cultural or national backgrounds. Promoting public recognition of differences, multiculturalism illustrates the crossing of culture and equality.
However thanks to media and United States immigration research, that showed that adolescents may be more receptive to new and foreign cultural values and beliefs than adults, globalization as well as individual autonomy and family obligation may influence adolescents with their cultural identity formation. Television and the internet, providing exposures to new ideas, events and people, influence their development of both their local and global identities.
Nonetheless multiculturalism and assimilation both represent general models at the two extremes and “contemporary adolescents are coming of age in multicultural world where creating a cultural identity has become complex. Often, they face the task of integrating diverse cultural beliefs and behaviors conveyed to them by multiple agents of socialization--socialization agents that, at times, are at odds with one another (i.e. parents and TV). The task of forming a coherent cultural identity that allows adolescents to become contributing members of society presents challenges that may be stressful or even considerably more problematic. However, adolescent cultural identity formation also presents challenges that may be met by developing new skills, the kinds of skills necessary for a multicultural world, that allows adolescents to function well psychologically and to contribute to society.” (Jensen)











Jensen, Lene Arnett. "Coming of Age in a Multicultural World: Globalization and
    Adolescent Cultural Identity Formation." Applied Developmental Sciences 7.3



    (2003): 189-96. PDF file.

The World of Seven Billion



The map shows population density; the brightest points are the highest densities. Each country is colored according to its average annual gross national income per capita, using categories established by the World Bank (see key below). Some nations— like economic powerhouses China and India—have an especially wide range of incomes. But as the two most populous countries, both are lower middle class when income is averaged per capita.